YSL Ruz / Rouge Volupte #30 – Faubourg Peach

Trazila sam neki breskvasti karmin, tacnije svetlo koralni, tacnije – nesto svetlo ali da bude izmedju roze i narandzastog, inspirisalo me leto, i tako to. Pre nekoliko godina Lancome je proizvodio Juicy Rouge, nesto izmedju ruza i sjaja, i jedna od njihovih boja,  Sucre d’Orge, mi je bila omiljena letnja boja za usne ikada. I bila je bas tako svetlo koralno-breskvasta. A onda su prestali da prave tu boju, pa i taj karmin, i ja sam dugo posle toga pokusavala da nadjem nesto sto ce ga zameniti.

Setala sam juce po Sephori, i nikako nisam mogla da se odlucim izmedju njih nekoliko, dok mi prodavacica nije pokazala ovaj – ljubav na prvi pogled, ah. Onda sam se setila svih recenzija koje sam za ovaj ruz procitala, i morao je biti moj…

Sve je bas kako treba da bude – boja je divna. Usne cini mekim i svilenim, kao balzam. Jako je pigmentisan, sto je cudno za ovako mekan  i sjajan ruz (cak toliko da ako se nanese na suve usne vidi se svaka linijica, pa preporucujem mekane usne pre nanosenja, i bolje mi je kad ga stavljam cekicom ili kad samo malo natapkam na usta nego kad se maze direktno iz pakovanja). Traje mi 3-4 sata u punom sjaju, a posle toga i dalje ostaje rozikasta boja na usnama.

Pakovanje je divno, metalno, tesko, elegantno, ekstravagantno (dobro, nije bas ekstravagantno), i pogodite: ima malo ogledalce na vrhu poklopca…. sto znaci da ga mozete brzo i efikasno popraviti gde god da se nalazite).

I tako je mekan, kao da ne nemate nista na usnama. Juce sam ga nosila tokom veceri, a jutros su mi usta kao da sam preko noci ostavila neki balzam na njima: meke, meke, glatke…

Jedina mana bi mu mogla biti cena: 3200 dinara, i moci cu sa sigurnoscu da kazem tek za nekoliko dana (kada ga budem jos testirala), ali za sada mislim da stvarno vredi svaku paru.

Boja mi je savrsena.

I onako sveukupno, mnooogo mi se svidja

…………………

I was looking for a peachy lipstick, more precisely, light coral, more precisely – something light but between pink and orange, as this hot summery weather  has inspired me, and all that. Actually, a  few years ago Lancome had a range of lipsticks Juicy Rouge, something in between lipstick and lip gloss, and one of their colors, Sucre d’Orge, was my favorite summer color for lips ever. It was light coral-peachy color I adored. And then, they stopped making that color, and the lipstick, and a long after that I was trying to find something to replace it.

Yesterday I was checking peachy lipsticks in Sephora, and I couldn’t decide between a few of them, but when the sales girl showed me this one – I fell in love, ah. Then I remembered all the reviews that I read about this lipstick, so it had to be mine…

Everything about this lipstick  is exactly how it should be – the color is wonderful. The lips are soft and silk, like you applied a lip balm, and not a lipstick. It is strongly pigmented, which is strange for such a soft and glossy lipstick (even so that if applied to dry lips every flow and line on the lips is showing, so I recommend softening lips before applying, and it looks even better when I just dot it on lips or apply it lightly with lip brush then to swipe it on lips directly from the packaging). It lasts for 3-4 hours in its full glory, and after that a pinkish color remains on the lips for a few more hours.

The packaging is beautiful, metal, heavy, elegant, extravagant (well, not exactly extravagant), and guess what else: there is a little mirror on the top of the lid …. which means that you can fix it quickly and efficiently wherever you are).

And it is so soft, just like you’re not wearing anything on the lips. Yesterday I wore it during the evening/night,  and thios morning my lips feel like I left some kind of lip treatment/lip balm overnight, soft, soft, smooth …

The only drawback could be the price: 32 euro, and I’ll be able to say with certainty in a few days (when I completely finish testing it), but for now I think it really is worth every cent.

The color is perfect.

And overall, I like it very very very much

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.